I was actually moving on with my more or less incredibly unpredictable life that seems to be in constant flux when it was brought to my attention via email that MENJ had been writing about me.
Unlike him, I have no reason to deny him the hits he will get from readers of this blog, because I don’t hide the source evidence for my accusations. Do note that he is however, a sad, low-self-esteemed, little whiner who denies he is ever wrong and goes to the trouble of removing comments which show him to be wrong — so don’t bother leaving any comments other than ones that show you support him 100% in his endeavours.
I feel obligated to answer his little love letter to me, in response to the issue of Arlene Tan being not Makcik Hajjah Sitt Al-Wuzara, that led his utter and complete humiliation at the fact that he was exposed for all to see to be an utterly shameless and proudly ignorant cretin through the comments he made throughout my blog as well.
When all else fails and you fail in defending your arguments, what do you do next? You threaten a legal suit, of course!
This comment precedes a screenshot of an email thread between me and Arlene to target MENJ as one of the parties responsible for endangering her life.
It appears the kooky liar still won’t admit that his actions are tantamount to prodding a murderous mob into introducing their brand of justice towards an innocent woman.
I am not calling for censorship because you disagree with me on the Internet; I am telling you to stop instigating people into committing hate crimes.
Have you no decency left in that swollen arrogance-filled knob of protein you call a brain?
While I initially believed that Arlene Tan was MHSAW at first (which I clearly said was in my personal capacity…aren’t anyone entitled to hold onto their own beliefs?), subsequent evidences discovered have made me revise my opinion in that Arlene Tan may actually know who is MHSAW, or is connected in some way to a person who does know MHSAW personally or even MHSAW herself.
To translate this into a metaphor everyone can understand, MENJ just said he dropped the ball for mistaking Arlene for Makcik, then took the ball, said he is actually bowling and not playing rugby, then sheepishly walks into the crowd with the ball hidden beneath his shirt hoping nobody notices.
Although Arlene Tan is not MHSAW (and I will not apologise to her, regardless, because I still think she’s an apostate for comparing Islam with communist North Korea)
Or in literal terms, he does not have the decency to even apologize.
After discovering the owner of the IC held by MHSAW, I have a deep suspicion that Adlin Abd Jalil could be the real MHSAW. Until today, there has been no police report lodged by Adlin herself against the people who may or may not have used her IC unwillingly, which leads me to suspect that the use of Adlin’s IC was consensual and intentional. Note also the lack of coverage by these same group of people, as opposed to their prominent sound-bytes of denials when the news first broke out about Arlene Tan being actually the real MHSAW. As if they are trying to cover up something.
I do not know Adlin so it was impossible for me to ask her if she is alive, let alone whether she was Internet superstar Makcik Hajjah Sitt Al-Wuzara. Having witnessed the sort of thing that passes for evidence for an accusation, such as taking a screenshot out of context without giving a link to the source material, or a photocopy of an IC posted on the Internet by the person he is accusing of being Makcik to be the only evidence necessary for another witch hunt — I decided to ignore these dishonest loons because I know that without actual evidence, as we can all see, nothing happens — except for the naked exposure of kooks and liars for who they are.
Yes. Surprising. I know. That I have better things to do other than tell dishonest people they are wrong every time they write something dishonest.
That said, note that one of the reasons he gives that Adlin may be Makcik is built on the premise that the entire gang of Arlene’s friends aren’t jumping to her rescue means Adlin is his Makcik.
And contrast that to his implication that us jumping to the defence of Arlene was evidence that she was Makcik.
The other side of the divide are shaking in their boots and are vehemently defending an individual whom they claim has no direct connection to or knew MHSAW personally. This makes me very suspicious. Would a criminal go to all lengths defending a stranger who has no connection to him / her for a crime committed by the criminal himself / herself? To what purpose does it serve?
MENJ’s hypothesis allow no path for him to ever be wrong.
Sounds positively religious.
Having said this, however, I still believe that if Arlene Tan is properly questioned by the police or authorities concerned, she may be able to give them new leads to apprehend MHSAW and not just that, the whole atheist movement in Malaysia. Which, I think, is the real reason as to why these people are vehemently protecting Arlene. She is the keystone to the whole puzzle, you bring her down and everyone else connected to the whole movement will go down with her in flames.
Having nothing else but a rugby ball he claims is a bowling ball forming a distinctive bulge under his jersey, MENJ tries to tell the crowd it’s not his fault that he can’t play rugby, that it was the referee’s fault for giving him a bowling ball shaped like a rugby.
tl;dr
This is my response.
