There have been recent arguments, which I have myself encountered, on why I should bother challenging the prevailing views of others; why I should attack their cherished beliefs although they claim to have done nothing to attack my beliefs.
A recent debate comes to mind which didn’t even qualified as a debate as a tone-troll clumsily avoided the argument by calling those who pointed out the atrocities in his/her cherished Quran by calling us all haters and wankers.
Well, tough luck laddie/lassie. This is what you get if you debate with people who value honesty and clarity. To discuss and find out how the world works, we must be willing to open our eyes and appraise the evidence honestly; and not as a huge proportion of the religious like to do, which is to ignore the parts that contradict with their moral compass and knowledge of how the world works.
Atheism is not a science, it is simply a lack of belief in god, gods, deities, and other supernatural beings unproven by science. When we do science, we must be clear, that we are all atheists because the evidence does not prove the existence of your cherished delusion.
Atheism is not synonymous with science, but it does lead to the scientific method. For science pedagogy, teaching science requires one to be an atheist, and not slip in personal convictions about the way the world works according to your superstitions.
That’s simply the way it is.
I still resent one of my Form 6 Biology teachers because the way he taught me evolution was to sprinkle in copious, nauseas amounts of doubts on the theory of evolution based upon his Christian upbringing.
Now that I am no longer affected by his ability to mark me down, I can safely say to him: “Go fuck yourself. Your students deserve a proper science education. The classroom is not a place for you to express personal beliefs, it is to teach science, to spread knowledge, to encourage critical thinking, to appraise the evidence with the utmost honesty and clarity.”
You can quote me on that.
PZ Myers recently gave a talk at AAI Copenhagen 2010 regarding the need to be more atheistic in class. We should not pander and fit the curricula to avoid challenging a student’s preconceived ideas of the world; and Myers is as convincing as ever.



